skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 154288 Find in a Library
Title: Probability, Danger, and Coercion: A Study of Risk Perception and Decision Making in Mental Health Law
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:19  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1995)  Pages:49-65
Author(s): P Slovic; J Monahan
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 17
Sponsoring Agency: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Chicago, IL 60603
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Two studies examine two issues fundamental to the relationship between dangerousness and coercion in mental health law: how judgments of probability of doing harm and dangerousness are formed and the extent to which these two concepts are equivalent, as well as how much danger is enough to trigger coercive intervention.
Abstract: Study participants were 95 women and 96 men who answered an ad in the University of Oregon student newspaper. Most were university students. They were shown hypothetical stimulus vignettes that described mental patients, and they were asked to assess the probability that the patient would harm someone else, whether the patient should be categorized as "dangerous," and whether coercion should be used to ensure treatment. Findings show that probability and dangerousness judgments were systematically related and were predictive of the judged necessity for coercion; however, judged probability was strongly dependent on the form of the response scale, suggesting that probability was not represented consistently and quantitatively in participants' minds. The second study replicated these findings with forensic clinicians as participants. These results underscore the importance of violence toward others in mental health law and have important implications for the manner in which risk assessments are formulated for use by the legal system. 7 tables, appended study instruments, and 33 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Criminality prediction; Dangerousness; Intervention; Involuntary treatment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=154288

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.