skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 154293 Find in a Library
Title: Social Organization of a Home Office Initiative
Journal: European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice  Volume:2  Issue:2  Dated:(1994)  Pages:141-167
Author(s): P Rock
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 27
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This article describes the changing organization, functions, and institutional attitudes of the British Home Office.
Abstract: For a long time, the Home Office could quite reasonably be portrayed as a cautious institution that sat at the center of the British criminal justice system, preferring to manage rather than innovate, responding to problems and crises as they arose. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Canadian and American methods were imported into a Home Office that was moving towards a greater engagement with innovation in the wake of a growing disillusionment with the conventional armaments of the criminal justice system. The Programme Development Unit was established, and its activist, statutory and voluntary groups were free-standing and separate from policy divisions. In its first year it encouraged applications from outside the Home Office for projects to reduce or prevent criminality and domestic violence. Further out, in the community itself, ideas about innovation revolved around empowerment as the answer to the problems of the powerless, alienated, and troubled. The ideas that actually returned to the Home Office, partially refracted by official discourse, talked about supporting, counseling and educating target populations of victims or of people at risk of victimizing others. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): British Home Office; Crime prevention measures; Criminology; Domestic assault; Foreign criminal justice systems; Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA); US/foreign comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.