skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 155830 Find in a Library
Title: The Knock and Announce Rule: A New Approach to the Destruction-of-Evidence Exception
Journal: Columbia Law Review  Volume:93  Issue:3  Dated:(April 1993)  Pages:685-719
Author(s): C P Garcia
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 35
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A number of courts have recently adopted a blanket rule allowing police armed with valid search warrants to knock down the front doors of homes and rush inside with guns drawn when the object of the search is drugs and the home has a toilet; the rationale for this position, despite the Fourth Amendment search and seizure rules, is that suspects frequently destroy evidence before the police enter.
Abstract: This article traces the common law history, purpose and constitutionalization of the knock and announce rule and highlights the ambiguity arising over what circumstances trigger the destruction-of-evidence exception. The second section demonstrates how the war on drugs, by encouraging a blanket exception to the rule, threatens to overwhelm it, while the particularity approach, which narrowly focuses on individual liberty, undermines effective drug law enforcement. The author suggests a new legal framework to determine when an unannounced entry violates the unreasonable search standard and provides a mechanism for police to develop cost-effective alternatives that will further the objectives of drug law enforcement without jeopardizing individual protection. 208 notes
Main Term(s): Drug law enforcement
Index Term(s): Courts; No-knock warrants; Search and seizure laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=155830

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.