skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 156177 Find in a Library
Title: Pretext Seizures: The Constitutional Question
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:64  Issue:7  Dated:(July 1995)  Pages:28-32
Author(s): K A Crawford
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 5
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the nature of pretext seizures, a defense technique which alleges that a seizure is illegal if the police officer has an ulterior motive and uses the seizure as a pretext for further investigation.
Abstract: The subjective approach to pretext seizures, based on the ruling in State v. Blair, focused exclusively on the police officer's state of mind at the time of the seizure. If a seizure on a relatively minor violation was motivated by the officer's wish to investigate a more serious offense, the search would be found illegal. That approach seems to have been supplanted by the objective approach, in which appellate courts confronted with defense claims of improper pretext seizures evaluate the officer's actions on the basis of objective reasonableness. Unfortunately, courts do not always agree on what makes a seizure objectively reasonable. Law enforcement agencies can be prepared to meet the pretext challenge by keeping accurate, detailed records of the number and types of seizures made. These records would prove that officers follow established procedures, not ulterior motives, in instigating seizures. 23 notes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Pretextual police conduct; Reasonable suspicion; Search and seizure
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.