skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 156336 Find in a Library
Title: No-Drop Policies in the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Cases: Guarantee to Action or Dangerous Solution?
Journal: Fordham Law Review  Volume:63  Issue:3  Dated:(December 1994)  Pages:853-881
Author(s): A Corsilles
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 29
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A "no-drop" policy denies the victim of domestic violence the option of freely withdrawing a complaint once formal charges have been filed; this note examines no-drop policies, explores the impetus for their adoption, and evaluates the policies' claimed merits and drawbacks.
Abstract: Part I examines different types of no-drop policies and surveys the jurisdictions that have instituted them or addressed their adoption. Part II explores the reasons that underlie the adoption of no-drop policies, and Part III assesses the policies' claimed benefits and risks. Finally, Part IV argues that the merits of no-drop policies outweigh their drawbacks and calls for States to enact measures that promote their adoption. This note concludes that no-drop policies can play an important role in combatting domestic violence, because they account for victims' realities, counteract longstanding justifications for inaction, and transform the statutory promise of justice for battered women into a credible threat of prosecution for their batterers. By dismissing cases simply because a victim requests it, prosecutors allow batterers to extend their power and control into the courtroom. No-drop policies have been used in a number of jurisdictions throughout the country and have achieved positive changes in the attitudes of victims and justice personnel concerning the role of criminal prosecution in combatting domestic violence. No-drop policies close the gap between the statutory promise of protection for battered women and the justice they receive. 208 footnotes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Domestic assault; Female victims; Prosecution
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.