skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 156428 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Boot Camp Prisons and Recidivism in Eight States
Journal: Criminology  Volume:33  Issue:3  Dated:(August 1995)  Pages:327-357
Author(s): D L MacKenzie; R Brame; D McDowall; C Souryal
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 31
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 90-DD-CX-0061
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines recidivism rates for offenders who complete boot camp programs and the rates for comparison group counterparts.
Abstract: Recidivism reduction is an important objective of many correctional programs. Recent survey data suggest that boot camp prisons (also referred to as shock incarceration programs) are no exception. In this study, the authors examine recidivism among boot camp completers in eight States during community supervision. They then assess these recidivism patterns in light of how one or more comparison groups in each State perform. For most states, two or more recidivism measures (such as arrest, revocation, and revocation for new crimes or technical violations) are employed. All of the programs studied had military drill and ceremony, hard labor, physical training, and strict rules and discipline; these constitute the core components of boot camp prisons. If these components effectively reduce the recidivism of offenders, the authors consider that they would have observed a consistent pattern across States, a pattern of lower recidivism rates for boot camp graduates in contrast to those of the comparison groups. This did not occur, and the authors conclude that these components in and of themselves do not reduce the recidivism of participating offenders. Rather, program effectiveness must be judged on a State-by-State basis. Tables, footnotes, figures, references
Main Term(s): Corrections
Index Term(s): Florida; Georgia (USA); Illinois; Louisiana; New York; Oklahoma; Program evaluation; Programs; Recidivism statistics; Shock incarceration programs; South Carolina; Statistics; Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.