skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 156496 Find in a Library
Title: Feigning Incompetency to Stand Trial: An Investigation of the Georgia Court Competency Test
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:19  Issue:4  Dated:(August 1995)  Pages:363-373
Author(s): S Gothard; R Rogers; K W Sewell
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 11
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Georgia Court Competency Test (GCCT) was administered to offenders who were asked to feign incompetency to stand trial, and the results were compared to control and pretrial defendants (both competent and incompetent).
Abstract: Participants were recruited from the San Diego Forensic Evaluation Unit, a unit that evaluates inmates referred by courts for pretrial assessments. All participants were independently evaluated on issues of malingering and competency to stand trial. The total sample consisted of 108 males with a mean age of 32 years. Findings demonstrated that offenders appeared to be able to simulate incompetency and tended to score lower on the GCCT than their truly incompetent counterparts. A newly developed Atypical Presentation Scale for the GCCT showed promise in detecting simulators. Additionally, several strategies were explored that included simulator failure of very simple items, such as floor effect, and variable success on items of increasing difficulty. The authors conclude that persons with experience in the criminal justice system can easily modify their responses on the GCCT to the point that they could be categorized as incompetent. Optimum cutting scores are presented for forensic clinicians to use in screening defendants for feigned incompetency. An appendix lists questions asked of study participants. 23 references and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): California; Competency to stand trial; Male offenders; Malingering
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=156496

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.