skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 156515 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Innocence and the Death Penalty
Corporate Author: US Congress
Senate Cmtte on the Judiciary
United States of America
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 180
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
US Congress
Washington, DC 20510
Publication Number: ISBN 0-16-044203-6
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislative/Regulatory Material
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary held hearings vis- a-vis a bill to allow a prisoner under sentence of death to obtain judicial review of newly discovered evidence showing he is probably innocent of the crime for which he was convicted.
Abstract: Many Americans, including prominent politicians, oppose expansion of the death penalty or favor its abolition altogether because of the risk that an innocent person might be executed. Two men who were sentenced to death, and were nearly wrongly executed, testified at the hearing. Supporters of capital punishment believe that some crimes are so heinous as to merit this ultimate sentence. They would argue that current legislation provides for lengthy litigation that allows many murderers to avoid their execution for years, and that the system contains adequate safeguards to protect innocent persons from wrongful execution. Other witnesses at this hearing included prosecutors and defense attorneys, and representatives of advocacy and lobbying groups on both sides of this issue.
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Appeal procedures; Capital punishment; Corrections; Federal legislation; US Senate; Wrongful incarceration
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=156515

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.