skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 156844 Find in a Library
Title: Liability Issues in Juvenile Detention
Author(s): M Solar; L Lund
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 0
Sponsoring Agency: Eastern Kentucky University
Richmond, KY 40475
National Juvenile Detention Assoc
Richmond, KY 40475
Sale Source: Eastern Kentucky University
Dept of Correctional Training Resource Ctr
202 Perkins Building
Richmond, KY 40475
United States of America
Type: Training (Aid/Material)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In this video, two of the Nation's leading juvenile attorneys discuss the constitutional requirements and liability issues associated with juvenile detention and corrections, based upon recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Abstract: The format for the video consists of lectures by the two attorneys, followed by questions from the audience and answers by the lecturers. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Canton v. Harris is first considered. The Court held in this case that the inadequacy of police training may serve as a basis for section 1983 liability only where the failure to train amounts to deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom the police come into contact. The lecturer then applies this decision to juvenile corrections. Measures of "deliberate indifference" are also discussed. Turner v. Safely is discussed as well. The Court ruled that the "reasonable/rational relationship" test (not "strict scrutiny") is the proper examination for determining whether prison rules and regulations violate inmates' constitutional rights. Other U.S. Supreme Court cases discussed are Daniels v. Williams, Davidson v. Cannon, Pembaur v. Cincinnati, Doe v. Arguelles, Board of Pardons v. Allen, and Desheney v. Winnebego County Department of Social Services. Legal parameters are discussed for offender classification, health and mental health care, visitor access to inmates, programming, inmate classification and screening, employee training and supervision, environmental conditions, and restraint.
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention staff training
Index Term(s): Juvenile facility management; Legal liability; Prisoner's rights; US Supreme Court decisions
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. VHS color video, 2 hrs. 44 mins.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=156844

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.