skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 157429 Find in a Library
Title: Case for Abolishing Shelter for Examination: Judicial Review and Police Powers in China
Journal: Police Studies  Volume:17  Issue:4  Dated:(Winter 1994)  Pages:41-60
Author(s): H L Fu
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 20
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Pretrial detention for preventive and investigative purposes for up to 3 months is common not only in China but also in Western countries; at issue, however, is whether an institutional remedial process is available to persons whose interests are adversely affected.
Abstract: In China, police have wide detention powers outside the criminal process. The most controversial police power to detain is the Shourong Shencha, or shelter for examination (SE). This form of preventive and investigative detention allows police to detain some suspects for up to 3 months without judicial review. The SE has been justified on the grounds that crime has become a serious social problem in China and drastic measures such as the SE are necessary to maintain political stability in a period of social change. The key issue is whether an institutional remedial process is available to persons whose interests are adversely affected, and the lack of such an institutional remedial process in China makes the SE substantially and procedurally unfair. In essence, the SE violates constitutionally guaranteed rights and represents a blatant abuse of the criminal justice process. The only alternative is to dismantle the SE and replace it with a judicially sanctioned pretrial detention system. Police power in China is examined in relation to uses and abuses of the SE, the power to detain and arrest, the Security Administration Punishment Act, the administrative penalty known as Re-Education Through Labor, judicial review under the Administrative Litigation Law, and police response to judicial review. 28 references and 20 endnotes
Main Term(s): Foreign police
Index Term(s): China; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Foreign criminal justice systems; Foreign judicial systems; Foreign laws; Judicial review; Pretrial detention
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=157429

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.