skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 157481 Find in a Library
Title: Confessions Made to the Expert Witness: Some Professional Issues
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry  Volume:5  Issue:2  Dated:(September 1994)  Pages:237-247
Author(s): G Gudjonsson
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 11
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Professional and ethical issues associated with confessions that criminal defendants sometimes make to expert witnesses in cases in which they have retracted a previous confession to the police are examined and illustrated using case examples from Great Britain.
Abstract: The confession to the mental health professional may partly or fully support the prosecution case. These cases raise four professional and ethical issues: (1) the nature of the expert witness's assessment, (2) what protection defendants should have when interviewed by expert witnesses, (3) disclosure, and (4) confidentiality. Issues related to the psychological assessment include the differing practices of clinical psychologists and the problems involved in interpreting the results from psychological tests without having conducted a comprehensive assessment of the defendant and the surrounding circumstances of the case. Because a confession made during a psychological assessment can have serious legal repercussions, especially if the trial judge allows the confession in evidence, it is important to ensure the full protection of the defendant's rights. Defense attorneys may ask experts to delete references to a confession, but deleting relevant parts at the request of the defense attorney seriously undermines and expert's objectivity and integrity and can mislead the court. Finally, professionals can overcome the confidentiality dilemma by informing clients about the limits of confidentiality. 17 references
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Confessions; Criminology; Expert witnesses; Great Britain/United Kingdom; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychological evaluation; Recanting testimony
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.