skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 157812 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA); General Report
Author(s): D R Gerstein; R A Johnson; H J Harwood; D Fountain; N Suter; K Malloy
Corporate Author: National Opinion Research Center (NORC)
United States of America

Lewin-VHI, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 96
Sponsoring Agency: California Dept of Alcohol and Drug Programs
Sacramento, CA 95814
Lewin-VHI, Inc
Fairfax, VA 22030
National Opinion Research Center (NORC)
Chicago, IL 60637
Grant Number: 92-001100
Publication Number: ADP 94-629
Sale Source: California Dept of Alcohol and Drug Programs
1700 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report from the California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA) addresses the effectiveness, benefits, and costs of alcohol and drug treatment in California, using State databases, provider records, and follow-up interviews with participants in treatment.
Abstract: The cost of treating approximately 150,000 participants represented by the CALDATA study sample in 1992 was $209 million. Each day of treatment paid for itself on the day it was received, primarily through an avoidance of crime. The benefits of alcohol and other drug treatment outweighed the costs of treatment by ratios from 4:1 to greater than 12:1, depending on the type of treatment. Benefits after treatment persisted through the second year of follow-up for the limited number of participants followed for as long as 2 years. This suggests that projected cumulative lifetime benefits of treatment will be substantially higher than the shorter-term figures. The level of criminal activity declined by two-thirds from before treatment to after treatment. The greater the length of time spent in treatment, the greater the percentage of reduction in criminal activity. Declines of approximately two-fifths also occurred in the use of alcohol and other drugs from before treatment to after treatment. Approximately one-third reductions in hospitalizations were reported from before treatment to after treatment. For each type of treatment studied, there were slight or no differences in effectiveness based on gender, age, or ethnicity. Overall, treatment did not have a positive effect on the economic situation of the participants during the study period. 38 tables and 11 figures
Main Term(s): Drug treatment programs
Index Term(s): Alcoholism treatment programs; California; Cost effectiveness analysis
Note: DCC.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.