skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 158084 Find in a Library
Title: Racial Justice Act: A Simple Matter of Justice
Journal: University of Dayton Law Review  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1995)  Pages:699-713
Author(s): D Edwards; J Conyers Jr
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 15
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article argues that the proposed Federal Racial Justice Act (RJA) would ensure that the death penalty is not disparately applied based on the race of the offender or victim.
Abstract: In 1987 the U.S. Supreme Court held that a jurisdiction's pattern of racial bias in applying the death penalty, no matter how consistent, is irrelevant to any individual case in that jurisdiction. The RJA is an effort to counter this ruling. The RJA allows courts to consider evidence of a consistent pattern of racially discriminatory death sentences in the sentencing jurisdiction. It would allow the courts to consider the nature of the cases being compared, the prior records of the offenders, and other nonracial factors. If a court determines there was racial bias in the challenged case, the court will set aside the death sentence but not the underlying conviction. A person who overturns his/her death sentence will be resentenced to an appropriate term of imprisonment, up to and including life without possibility of release. The RJA requires a fact-specific analysis; it does not provide grounds for a systemic or statewide challenge to the death penalty. This article counters the specific arguments used by opponents of the RJA. 62 footnotes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Federal legislation; Racial discrimination; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=158084

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.