skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 158088 Find in a Library
Title: Proposed Evidence Rules 413 to 415: Some Problems and Recommendations
Journal: University of Dayton Law Review  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1995)  Pages:753-762
Author(s): J S Liebman
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 10
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article expresses some reservations about and suggests some alternatives to Proposed Rules 413-415 of the Federal Rules of Evidence under Section 320935 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994.
Abstract: Rules 413-415 would liberalize the admissibility of "propensity evidence" in criminal and civil cases that involve allegations of sexual assault and child molestation. The article recommends that if some version of the proposed rules is to be retained, the rules at least should be amended to limit admissibility to evidence of prior convictions for sexual assault or child molestation. This change would avoid some of the worst potential abuses that may arise from the use of unsubstantiated charges as a basis for an inference that a defendant has a propensity to offend and thus that he or she is guilty of the offense at hand. This change would also keep trial judges from having to conduct numerous disruptive, confusing, and time- consuming "mini-trials" on the validity of each allegation of prior misconduct. For these and other reasons, the author recommends that the character rules in the Federal Rules of Evidence should be left intact. Generally, the article concludes that the particular changes proposed are overbroad, potentially unconstitutional, and poorly drafted. A more modest change would include compulsive, but not other prior or subsequent, sexual assault and child molestation within the definition of habitual conduct that the Federal Rules of Evidence currently make admissible to show action in conformity. If the proposed rules are to become effective in their current form, then modifications should be made to integrate them within the structure of the Federal Rules of Evidence and to cure various drafting anomalies. 28 footnotes
Main Term(s): Federal courts
Index Term(s): Child Sexual Abuse; Federal legislation; Rules of evidence; Sexual assault
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.