skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 158179 Find in a Library
Title: Referral Decision Scale With Mentally Disordered Inmates: A Preliminary Study of Convergent and Discriminant Validity
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:19  Issue:5  Dated:(October 1995)  Pages:481-492
Author(s): R Rogers; K W Sewell; K Ustad; V Reinhardt; W Edwards
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 13
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the convergent and discriminant validity of the Referral Decision Scale (RDS), a rapid screening instrument developed by Teplin and Swartz to identify schizophrenia and major mood disorders in jail populations, in a sample of 108 mentally disordered inmates in a Texas county jail.
Abstract: The analysis considered this instrument, the Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia--Change Version (SADS-C) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). The participants averaged 33.29 years of age. The sample was 31.5 percent black, 5.6 percent Hispanic, 53.7 percent white, and 9.3 unrecorded. The majority were facing multiple charges that included violent and drug offenses. Results revealed that the RDS provided moderate evidence of convergent validity but failed to demonstrate acceptable discriminant validity, because of high intercorrelations on RDS subscales. In comparison, the SADS-C yielded similar evidence of convergent validity and excellent discriminant validity. Findings did not support the clinical use of the RDS to screen inmates for common disorders (schizophrenia, major depression, and bipolar disorder), although it might still be used in correctional settings to indicate general psychological impairment. The SADS-C should be used in the interim, and briefer screening instruments specifically targeted for correctional settings should be developed. Tables and 43 references (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Mentally ill inmates; Psychological evaluation; Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.