skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 158255 Find in a Library
Title: Blowing Smoke
Journal: ABA Journal  Volume:81  Dated:(October 1995)  Pages:56-60
Author(s): M Curriden
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 5
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses some of the tactics used both by defense lawyers and prosecutors to influence jury decisionmaking.
Abstract: The article contends that, in cases where the evidence strongly indicates the defendant's guilt, defense attorneys will raise issues that are essentially irrelevant to the facts of the case in order to confuse or polarize members of the jury. Judges report seeing more attempts to use backdoor evidence or to appeal to jurors' prejudices in recent years. The three most common methods used to turn attention away from the facts at issue in a case are to challenge the government or the law itself and divert attention from the defendant's participation in the alleged crime, to create an underlying tone to make it appear that the defendant is being treated unfairly, and to slip the inference in the back door. Appealing to racial and sexual stereotypes seems to be an increasingly popular diversionary tactic.
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Attorney-jury interaction; Jury decisionmaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=158255

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.