skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 158283 Find in a Library
Title: Publication of the Name of a Sexual Assault Victim: The Collision of Privacy and Freedom of the Press
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:31  Issue:5  Dated:(September-October 1995)  Pages:379-399
Author(s): C M Bast
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 21
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In March 1991, William Kennedy Smith allegedly raped a woman at the Kennedy family estate in Palm Beach, Florida; when a supermarket tabloid published the victim's name, the State attorney filed two misdemeanor charges against the Globe, claiming the tabloid violated a Florida statute that makes publishing a sexual assault victim's name a second-degree misdemeanor.
Abstract: The case illustrates a conflict between the right of privacy and freedom of the press. Statutes in Florida, Georgia, Michigan, South Carolina, and Wisconsin prohibit publishing a rape victim's name, although U.S. Supreme Court Decisions have held that freedom of the press outweighs privacy interests. State courts have also decided cases concerning conflict between the right of privacy and freedom of the press. Several cases have involved statutes that either prohibit identifying a sexual assault victim or allow the court to order that victim and perpetrator names be suppressed. State courts have invariably sided with the press and have refused to hold media defendants liable for damages for invasion of privacy. Statutes prohibiting the identification of sexual assault victims, applicable U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and State court cases are reviewed, and the constitutionality of such statutes is analyzed. 77 footnotes
Main Term(s): Sexual assault victims
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Florida; Freedom of the press; Georgia (USA); Michigan; Rape victim shield laws; Right of privacy; South Carolina; State laws; US Supreme Court decisions; Wisconsin
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.