skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 158316 Find in a Library
Title: GQT Polygraph Test: Scoring and Validity
Journal: Polygraph  Volume:24  Issue:3  Dated:(1995)  Pages:234-236
Author(s): M J Crowe; M Chimarys; J Schwartz
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 3
Type: Report (Technical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The use of polygraph examinations for detecting deception assumes that physiological responding will be greater when a deceptive response is made.
Abstract: For purposes of evaluation, the physiological reaction to an issue-related (relevant) question is often compared to that of a probable lie (control) question, a question not directly related to the issue. An examination format which has developed in the field of polygraphy is the General Question Techynique (GQT). This technique brackets and compares the relevant question with a modified or disguised control question about lying during the examination. To evaluate the GQT, 30 different GQT polygraph series were evaluated by nine polygraphers. Results indicated the GQT was valid for detecting deception when charts were numerically scored against the strongest control question. Visually scoring the overall chart was somewhat less accurate but had fewer inconclusive results. Scoring against the weaker control's reaction was not acceptable because such scoring increased the identification of deceptive individuals from the charts at the cost of eliminating any correct identification of charts from nondeceptive people.
Main Term(s): Science and Technology
Index Term(s): Polygraph reliability; Polygraph techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=158316

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.