skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 158934 Find in a Library
Title: What Is a Reasonable Drug Testing Program?: Insight From Arbitration Decisions
Journal: Labor Law Journal  Volume:39  Issue:10  Dated:(October 1988)  Pages:688-695
Author(s): P A Veglahn
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 8
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines published arbitration decisions on employee drug testing programs and enumerates factors that influence arbitration decisions about the right of employers to implement drug testing programs.
Abstract: Employee drug testing has increased dramatically in recent years; 30 percent of Fortune 500 companies were involved in drug testing in 1985, an increase from 3 percent in 1982. The concern of employers over employee drug use is justifiable since research indicates drug users are 16 times more likely to be absent from work than nonusers, twice as likely to leave work early, three times more likely to be late for work, have four times as many accidents, and file five times as many compensation claims. A review of 41 published arbitration cases involving employee drug testing shows drug testing occurs in unionized companies under either negotiated testing programs or programs unilaterally imposed based on the claim that the management rights clause of collective bargaining agreements gives management the right to implement drug testing. Arbitrators are more likely to uphold the right to implement employee drug testing if testing is based on reasonable cause rather than being random. Employee drug testing may conflict with individual privacy rights, but arbitrators contend privacy concerns generally do not take precedence over an employer's well-founded desire for a drug-free workplace. An issue related to probable cause and privacy involves drug use off the job, and what constitutes an unsatisfactory drug test result has not been definitively established. The 41 arbitration decisions indicate an employer is on firm ground if the drug testing program is specifically negotiated with the union, is included in the contract and publicized, sets standards for requiring a drug test, establishes pass-fail scores, ensures proper handling of test samples, and specifies penalties for failing a drug test.
Main Term(s): Employee drug testing
Index Term(s): Arbitration; Drug testing; Employer-employee relations; Labor relations; Probable cause; Right of privacy; Substance abuse in the workplace; Unions
Note: DCC
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.