skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 159211 Find in a Library
Title: Reflexivity Run Riot: The Survival of the Prison Catch-All
Journal: Howard Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:34  Issue:4  Dated:(November 1995)  Pages:354-362
Author(s): P M Quinn
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 9
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This analysis of the prison rules in Great Britain concludes that Rule 47(21) should be eliminated, because it is contrary to two important principles and is unnecessary for punishing offenses against good order and discipline.
Abstract: The rule sets forth 22 types of offenses against discipline. Paragraph 21 does not refer to specific actions; instead it states that an infraction occurs if the prisoner "in any way offends against good order and discipline." Repeated demands have been made for the abolition of this paragraph. The paragraph does not allow for any strict construction of what may or may not constitute an offense. It may often operate retroactively to apply to an action that the inmate does not know is prohibited. During 1994, 7,537 charges brought under the paragraph were proved and resulted in 12,474 punishments, including 3,687 awards of additional days in prison. Political support for removing the rule is currently unlikely, however. Nevertheless, the catch-all phrase is of questionable legality; does little to enhance the concepts of fairness and justice; and may hinder rather than support the good order and discipline vital to correctional institutions. Notes, 26 references, and appended table
Main Term(s): Corrections in foreign countries
Index Term(s): Great Britain/United Kingdom; Inmate discipline; Inmate misconduct
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=159211

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.