skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 159884 Find in a Library
Title: Creative Sentencing Should Be Limited (From America's Prisons: Opposing Viewpoints, P 206-213, 1991, Stacey L. Tipp, ed. - See NCJ-159858)
Author(s): S G Calabresi
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: Greenhaven Press
Farmington Hills, MI 48333-9187
Sale Source: Greenhaven Press
P.O. Box 9187
Farmington Hills, MI 48333-9187
United States of America
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article argues that creative sentences present many problems for the administration of justice.
Abstract: Creative sentences give judges excessive discretion in sentencing, confers too much power on judges by allowing them to design the laws and apply them in certain situations, and gives judges too much power to identify sentencing beneficiaries and to tailor punishments. Many creative sentences have been illegal because the State legislatures have not given the courts the authority to impose those sentences for the crimes that have been committed. While creative sentences may help relieve prison overcrowding conditions, they fail to fulfill the sentencing objectives of retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation and restitution. Better alternative sanctions would include house arrest, shock incarceration, scarlet letter punishments, intensive supervision programs, and community service programs.
Main Term(s): Corrections
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Courts; Prison overcrowding
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=159884

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.