skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 161564 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of the Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) Initiative: Arizona Final Report
Corporate Author: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 136
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) mandate of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act requires States to develop and implement strategies to address and reduce the overrepresentation of minority youth in secure facilities; in an effort to facilitate compliance with the mandate, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention sponsored demonstration projects in five pilot States; this is the final evaluation report for the Arizona project.
Abstract: Arizona's DMC Initiative focused on the development and implementation of small, community-based programs and lent itself to a process evaluation design. The evaluation consisted of qualitative analysis of State-level project documents and interviews with key State-level DMC participants, as well as intensive investigation of local pilot project activities and interviews with project representatives. The major finding from Phase I research was that the nature and extent of differential treatment of youth varied between Anglo and minority youth, among minority youth, and from point to point in the juvenile justice system. The research also identified several potential sources of DMC, including systemwide discrimination, barriers to effective parental advocacy, inadequate cultural knowledge and skills among system administrators, and limited resources. Phase II activities included efforts to reduce DMC by modifying State legislation and local policies, as well as the development of a statewide advocacy program; the latter failed, primarily due to political indifference. Ultimately, the Phase II intervention strategy focused on the development of community-based pilot projects. Each of the seven funded projects addressed both systemic and socioeconomic causes of DMC. The local pilot project experiences showed the value of involving agency and community representatives, particularly minority community representatives, in the total DMC definition, identification, and intervention process. Phase II further showed the importance of ensuring unbiased political support at the State level, so that the State can adequately support local design and implementation efforts. Future plans are outlined. Extensive exhibits and appended evaluation forms
Main Term(s): Minority juvenile offenders
Index Term(s): Arizona; Black juvenile delinquents; Juvenile inmates; Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.