skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 161750 Find in a Library
Title: There's No Accounting for Judges
Journal: Albany Law Review  Volume:58  Issue:4  Dated:(1995)  Pages:1063-1085
Author(s): L H Schafran
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 23
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article considers the question of what can be done to insure that judges do not trivialize domestic violence or treat domestic violence as unimportant or as a man's right.
Abstract: The reports of state supreme court task forces on gender bias in the court contain many accounts of judges who trivialize violence against women. The author describes several cases where judges excused or even approved of mayhem and murder by a man when the victim was a wife, and cases where male judges' projection of themselves into domestic violence cases skewed justice and endangered women. Even when judges' actions are shocking, ignorant, or inexplicable, there often are only minimal mechanisms available to hold them accountable. Improving the judicial response to domestic violence requires multiple strategies focusing on the attitudes of candidates for the bench before they become judges, then on judicial education, specialized domestic violence courts, and the accountability that can be imposed on sitting judges through court watching, judicial performance evaluation, media attention, and insistence on a meaningful response from judicial disciplinary commissions. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Domestic assault; Judge selection; Judges; Judicial attitudes; Judicial conduct and ethics; Judicial discretion; Judicial immunity; Judicial performance evaluation; Victims of Crime
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.