skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 162399 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Investigating and Prosecuting Sex Offenders (From Managing Adult Sex Offenders: A Containment Approach, P 8.1- 8.8, 1996, Kim English, Suzanne Pullen, and Linda Jones, eds. - See NCJ-162392)
Author(s): C Nannetti; D Greer
Corporate Author: Colorado Division of Criminal Justice
United States of America

American Probation and Parole Assoc
The Council of State Government
United States of America
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: American Probation and Parole Assoc
Lexington, KY 40578-1910
Colorado Division of Criminal Justice
Denver, CO 80215
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 92-IJ-CX-K021
Sale Source: American Probation and Parole Assoc
The Council of State Government
P.O. Box 11910
Lexington, KY 40578-1910
United States of America
Type: Report (Technical Assistance)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Effective training on the dynamics of victimization and the characteristics of sex offending is essential for all professionals who manage sexual assault cases; Maricopa County (Ariz.) has established such training programs.
Abstract: Data from site visits conducted as part of NIJ- sponsored research on the management of sex offenders in the community revealed the need for specialized training for the professionals who investigate and prosecute sex offenders. In addition to the general training, professionals require specific training related to their tasks. Maricopa County's prosecutor established a sex crimes unit in 1986. In 1987, the unit and the Phoenix Police Department together offered training seminars to assist police personnel, child protective service workers, probation officers, and prosecutors in investigating, understanding, and managing sex crime cases. Other jurisdictions asked the Maricopa County training team to present their program in central locations around the State. The Arizona approach has succeeded because of teamwork, sensitivity to victims, increased knowledge that has improved case processing, and networking across the State. Potential barriers to training include resistance to training, lack of funding, and resistance to the team approach. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Arizona; Court personnel educational programs; Multidisciplinary correctional personnel Training; NIJ grant-related documents; Police education; Sexual assault victims
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.