skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 162403 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating Sex Offender Programs (From Managing Adult Sex Offenders: A Containment Approach, P 12.1-12-20, 1996, Kim English, Suzanne Pullen, and Linda Jones, eds. - See NCJ-162392)
Author(s): R K Przybyiski; K English
Corporate Author: Colorado Division of Criminal Justice
United States of America

American Probation and Parole Assoc
The Council of State Government
United States of America
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: American Probation and Parole Assoc
Lexington, KY 40578-1910
Colorado Division of Criminal Justice
Denver, CO 80215
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 92-IJ-CX-K021
Sale Source: American Probation and Parole Assoc
The Council of State Government
P.O. Box 11910
Lexington, KY 40578-1910
United States of America
Type: Report (Technical Assistance)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The evaluation of programs for managing sex offenders in the community is discussed, with emphasis on the use of a building-block approach that responds to the reality that full-scale program outcome evaluation is both costly and complicated.
Abstract: Program managers and correctional administrators contacted during NIJ-sponsored research on the management of sex offenders in the community frequently asked how they might best evaluate their programs. In planning an evaluation, three crucial points to remember are the need for researcher objectivity but not isolation, the need for evaluation to be more than a one-time event, and the possibility of some degree of evaluation regardless of resources and programs. Three forms of evaluation are program documentation and monitoring, process evaluations, and impact evaluations. Evaluation through documentation and monitoring is a standard evaluation model that almost any program can implement and use to assess effectiveness. Process evaluations consider how an outcome is produced rather than just the outcome itself. The strongest impact evaluations use research designs and measurement techniques that are modeled after laboratory techniques. Each of the evaluation approaches require different levels of resources and expertise. However, every program must be informed by ongoing evaluation if it is to be effective on an ongoing basis. The authors are members of the United States Bureau of Justice Assistance State Reporting and Evaluation Program's national advisory board. Footnotes, appended sample data collection form for sex offender programs, and 20 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Evaluation measures; Intensive supervision programs; NIJ grant-related documents; Program evaluation; Sex offender treatment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=162403

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.