skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 163693 Find in a Library
Title: Affirmative Action and the Public Interest (From Supreme Court Review, P 1-43, 1996, Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strsuss, et al, eds. - See NCJ 163692)
Author(s): D A Strauss
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 43
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding affirmative action concludes that although the decisions appear to present several anomalies, they make sense if understood as a response to a widespread problem in democratic politics rather than to the kinds of concerns that led to prohibitions of discrimination against minorities.
Abstract: The belief that affirmative action is like discrimination against minorities is unconvincing in the abstract; it is not surprising that the Court has not followed through on this belief in designing its doctrine. The Court's concern in these cases is implicit in the doctrine but has been only partially articulated. This concern is to ensure that affirmative action measures genuinely promote a public interest and do not simply award benefits to powerful interest groups. Strict scrutiny of affirmative action will inevitably cause some worthwhile affirmative actions to be lost because of inadequate consideration of the legitimate public interests that affirmative action might serve, fear of invalidation, or the administrative costs of establishing a program that will survive judicial review. The Court has not fully answered the question of why these costs should be incurred in this area but in so few others. Interest-group politics is a general problem in a democracy, and the country accepts interest-group measures in other areas. However, the court's reasons for considering affirmative action differently from ordinary legislation still need to be fully presented. Footnotes
Main Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions
Index Term(s): Affirmative action programs; Legal doctrines; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=163693

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.