skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 163695 Find in a Library
Title: Ashwander Revisited (From Supreme Court Review, P 71- 98, 1996, Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, et al, eds. - See NCJ 163692)
Author(s): F Schauer
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 28
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of one of the principles set forth in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority concludes that continued adherence to this principle of construing a statute so as to avoid having to make a constitutional decision is likely to be counterproductive.
Abstract: In the Ashwander decision Justice Brandeis stated seven principles for the avoidance of constitutional questions. Although the view that courts should be reluctant to intrude onto the prerogatives of the elected branches of government is appropriate, the Ashwander principle is based on an incorrect premise. Currently, disputes centered on the interpretation of Federal laws occupy an increasingly larger percentage of the Court's cases. As a result, this Ashwander principle has become increasingly important. The decision in the child pornography case of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. demonstrated that judicial invalidation and judicial interpretation are equally invasive into legislative prerogatives. Thus, the continued adherence to Ashwander is likely to be counterproductive. Little would be lost by abandoning Ashwander entirely. If that happened courts could focus directly on whether judges should substitute their judgment for that of Congress in any particular case. Footnotes
Main Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions
Index Term(s): Child Pornography; Intergovernmental relations; Juvenile victims; Legal doctrines; US Supreme Court
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=163695

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.