Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

NCJ Number:	164139

Title:	Relapse Prevention or Harm Reduction?

Journal:	Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment Volume:8 Issue:3 Dated:(July 1996) Pages:243-247

Author(s):	D R Laws

Date Published:	1996

Annotation:	This paper argues that the concept of harm reduction provides a more useful frame work for the management of sex offenders than relapse prevention (RP).

Abstract:	The concept of a continuum that ranges from excess through moderation to abstinence is the hallmark of contemporary harm reduction. Abstinence is still viewed as the "anchor point of minimal harm," but any movement toward reduced harm is desirable. Relapse prevention has as its goal the development of self- management techniques that will prevent a sex offender from reoffending. Relapse prevention and harm reduction are closely related approaches, but with different goals. The relapse- prevention model has abstinence as its goal; whereas, harm reduction views abstinence as highly desirable but not always achievable. Harm reduction is a skill-building approach that acknowledges the certainty of lapses and the possibility of total relapse; however, following a lapse or a total relapse, the road to abstinence can still be re-entered and the RP process reinstituted. The strict relapse prevention approach holds a zero-tolerance position, but a harm-reduction approach uses relapse prevention strategies to reduce the number and severity of relapses. The harm-reduction strategy is more realistic than the relapse prevention strategy, given the nature of sexual offending. It further recognizes that reducing the number of sex offenses through harm-reduction techniques makes society safer than it would be without such treatment techniques. 19 references

Main Term(s):	Criminology

Index Term(s):	Crime specific countermeasures; Evaluation measures; Recidivism causes; Sex offender treatment; Sex offenders; Sex offense causes; Sex offenses; Sexual behavior

Page Count:	5

Format:	Article

Type:	Issue Overview

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=164139

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library