skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 164318 Find in a Library
Title: Monetary Penalties in Scotland: A Research Based Review
Author(s): L Nicholson
Corporate Author: Scottish Office Central Research & Statistics Unit
Publications Coordinator
United Kingdom
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 83
Sponsoring Agency: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
Norwich, NR3 1GN,
Scottish Office Central Research & Statistics Unit
Edinburgh, EH11 3XA, Scotland
Publication Number: ISBN 0-11-495176-4
Sale Source: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
PO Box 29
Norwich, NR3 1GN,
United Kingdom
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Fines in Scotland were examined with respect to their history, nature, forms, use, enforcement, and imprisonment for defaults.
Abstract: The analysis revealed that common concerns expressed in the literature are achieving equality of impact of financial penalties on offenders with different financial means, maintaining the credibility of the fine through efficient enforcement measures, and reducing the level of nonpayment of monetary penalties. In addition, fines have a central role in the Scottish criminal justice system. Many sentencers are ambivalent regarding allowing time to pay in installments and whether to specify the alternative of imprisonment at imposition. Enforcement mechanisms include those aimed at willful defaulters and those aimed at offenders with limited financial resources and ability to pay. The peak of fine defaults in the 1980's coincided with a decline in the use of the fine. Low income, mismanagement of limited income, and competing financial commitments all contributed to defaults. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between inability to pay and unwillingness to pay. Issues for the 1990's include improved enforcement, unit fines, and the role of the compensation order. Tables and 108 references
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Criminology; Fine defaults; Fines; Scotland
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=164318

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.