skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 164509 Find in a Library
Title: LEAA/OJP (Law Enforcement Assistance Administration/Office of Justice Programs) Retrospective: Summary
Corporate Author: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 25
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents a summary of the observations offered by current and former Federal officials involved in the work of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) and its successor, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), at a one-day meeting on July 11, 1996; observations pertain to lessons learned over 30 years regarding how government can best address the problems of crime in the Nation.
Abstract: Participants agreed that the OJP should set priorities based on the knowledge that criminal justice agencies alone cannot solve crime problems. Further, OJP should strengthen its emphasis on planning and enlist agency and community representatives at the State and local levels to help shape the OJP agenda. Meeting participants recommended that OJP should be organized as a single agency, since it is difficult to achieve consistency and continuity in programming under its current fragmented statutory structure. Based on their collective experience and knowledge, the majority of meeting participants agreed that one of the most important OJP roles is to assist and more vigorously oversee State and local criminal justice planning. Staff should be planning experts, and OJP should provide a well-developed technical assistance program. Also, OJP should emphasize research, evaluation, and development. OJP should sponsor more "tier one" research and evaluation, demonstrate intellectual leadership, and convince the Congress of the importance of such research. Further, OJP should improve the flow of information to the public, to State and local agencies, and to the Congress, as well as use discretionary grants to encourage experimental approaches, help support programs that have proven effective, and fill in the gaps in State programming. An attendee list is provided.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Federal aid; Federal programs; Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA); Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.