skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 164726 Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing Guidelines: A State Perspective
Author(s): J Austin
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 0
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The impact of sentencing guidelines on sentencing disparity and prison crowding is assessed in this State-by-State analysis of sentencing practices.
Abstract: The focus is on the consequences of sentencing reform on corrections in general and on the prison system in particular. The following impacts of sentencing reform on the prison system are noted: sentence length has increased; fewer incentives exist for inmates to behave; sentencing disparity has increased; and prisons are more crowded with excessive prison terms. Fifteen States use sentencing guidelines, but most have indeterminate sentencing systems. Despite certain negative impacts of sentencing reform, determinate sentencing will likely continue; a primary reason involves the substantial costs involved for States to switch from an indeterminate to a determinate sentencing system. In actuality, States will likely move toward a blended sentencing system that combines features of both determinate and indeterminate practices.
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Determinate Sentencing; Indeterminate sentences; Mandatory Sentencing; Prison overcrowding; Sentence effectiveness; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform; Sentencing trends; State-by-state analyses
Note: NIJ Research in Progress. 57 minutes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=164726

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.