skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 164874 Find in a Library
Title: Comparing the Ad Hoc Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanitarian Law in the Former Yugoslavia and the Project for an International Criminal Court, Prepared by the International Law Commission
Journal: International Review of Penal Law  Volume:67  Dated:(1996)  Pages:139-208
Author(s): C L Blakesley
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 70
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: France
Annotation: This article compares the content and policy issues involved in two international laws to address war crimes and other human rights; one statute deals with human rights violations in the former Yugoslavia and the other with the creation of an international criminal court.
Abstract: The discussion compares the Statutes of the Ad Hoc Tribunal to Prosecute Persons for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian law in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia and that of the International Law Commission for the Creation of an International Criminal Court. Both statutes try to combine essential aspects of the adversarial or common law system and the civilian and inquisitorial systems. The analysis concludes that the attempts to protect and enforce human rights through the prosecution of those who commit serious violations of humanitarian law are important and laudable. The success of the tribunals and the viability of both peace and justice depend on promulgation, interpretation, supplementation, application, and enforcement. The Ad Hoc Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda and the proposed International Law Commission draft statute fall short of these goals, but they can and should be modified in ways to make them functional. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Felony courts
Index Term(s): Abuse of authority; Foreign courts; Human rights violations; International law; Jurisdiction; United Nations (UN); Yugoslavia
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=164874

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.