skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 164887 Find in a Library
Title: Language of Deceit: An Investigation of the Verbal Clues to Deception in the Interrogation Context
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:20  Issue:4  Dated:(August 1996)  Pages:443-458
Author(s): S Porter; J C Yuille
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 16
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study tested the hypothesis that reliable verbal indicators of deception exist in the interrogation context.
Abstract: The specific goal of the study was to test concurrently the clues identified in Porter and Yuille's (1995) review in a realistic crime simulation study. The clues examined are subsumed under the following categories: Statement Validity Analysis, Reality Monitoring, Sapir's Training Program, or Lexical Diversity. A total of 60 participants were recruited for a study that addressed "security effectiveness" and involved the participants in a simulated theft they were told was for the purpose of testing the effectiveness of a new security guard. The participants then provided either a truthful alibi, a partially deceptive account, a completely false alibi, or a truthful confession regarding the theft to "an interrogator hired for the purpose of investigating thefts" with a monetary incentive for convincing the interrogator of their truthfulness. Only three out of the 18 (16.7 percent) clues tested significantly differentiated the truthful and deceptive accounts. All three clues were derived from the Statement Validity Analysis technique (amount of detail reported, coherence, and admissions of lack of memory). Implications are discussed for credibility assessment in forensic interrogations. 59 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Alibis; Interview and interrogation; Suspect interrogation
Note: This is a component of the M.A. thesis of one author (Porter) and was presented at the 56th Annual Convention of the Canadian Psychological Association in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, June 1995.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.