NCJ Number: 166465
Title: Restorative Model Offers Personal Approach to Criminal Justice
Journal: Corrections Today Volume:58 Issue:2 Dated:(April 1996) Pages:86,88
Author(s): L O Robinson
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 2
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This address reviews the concepts of the restorative justice model compared to the current model and offers some examples of programs that reflect the concepts of restorative justice.
Abstract: There are three ways in which the principles of restorative justice differ from the traditional reparative model. First, the focus of the current system is the state, which demands accountability and defines that as punishment. The restorative model changes the focus to the victim. Although accountability is still central, it is a broader and more personal definition that holds the offender accountable to the victim who has been harmed and the community that has been disrupted. Second, that process is also distinct from the current one, which is adversarial and allows professional surrogates, such as attorney, to replace the principals. At best, the victim is a witness in the proceedings. With restorative justice, the victim is more involved and has the opportunity to ask questions. Further, the offender can play a role in making amends to the victim. Third, and perhaps most critical, the outcome in restorative justice, to right the wrong and repair the damage, is the critical measure of justice. If incarceration is required for public safety, this is part of the resolution. This does not, however, relieve the offender of the obligation to repay the victim or perform community service to compensate for the societal impact of the crime. Some programs that reflect the concepts of restorative justice are restitution, community service, and community-based victim-offender mediation. This address also reviews some of the research that shows the value and some of the limits of restorative justice as it is applied at various stages of criminal justice processing.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Accountability; Corrections policies; Restitution; Victim compensation; Victim services; Victim-offender reconciliation
Note: Abridged version of the closing breakfast address at the American Correctional Association 1996 Winter Conference, January 17, 1996, in Philadelphia, Pa.
To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=166465
. A title search of 