skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 166514 Find in a Library
Title: Understanding Gender Differences in Distributive and Procedural Justice
Journal: Social Justice Research  Volume:9  Issue:4  Dated:(December 1996)  Pages:351-369
Author(s): C T Kulik; E A Lind; M L Ambrose; R J MacCoun
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 19
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines gender differences in treatment and in judgments of distributive and procedural justice.
Abstract: Three hundred nine litigants who had been involved in arbitrated auto negligence lawsuits responded to exit surveys. Two mechanisms by which gender might influence justice perceptions were explored. First, a chivalry bias might be operating, in which the procedures systematically favor women over men. Results provided only modest support for the chivalry bias. While women received slightly better awards and perceived somewhat more control than men, these differences had no effect on perceptions of distributive or procedural justice. Second, men and women may differ systematically in the factors they use as indicators of distributive and procedural justice. The study revealed that men and women did differ on how they defined distributive justice, with women placing more emphasis on their perceived standing and on their perceptions of the favorability of their outcomes. There were no substantial gender differences in how procedural justice was defined. Results are interpreted in terms of how women might be responding to insecurity about facing a justice system historically dominated by men. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Arbitration; Behavioral science research; Court research; Criminology; Decisionmaking; Dispute resolution; Gender issues; Jurisprudence; Psychological research; Research; Statistics; Theory
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.