skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 166957 Find in a Library
Title: Swedish Sentencing Reform (From Politics of Sentencing Reform, P 95-123, 1995, Chris Clarkson and Rod Morgan, eds. -- See NCJ-166953)
Author(s): N Jareborg
Date Published: 1995
Page Count: 29
Sponsoring Agency: Oxford University Press
Oxford OX2 6DP, United Kingdom
Sale Source: Oxford University Press
Walton Street
Oxford OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Sweden's new sentencing law does not represent a significant change in the distribution of sanctions but does embrace preventive aims, appropriate sanctions, and measured punishment.
Abstract: Work on reforming the sentencing system in Sweden began in the mid-1970's. An initial report advocated less emphasis on incarceration, repression, and indeterminate sentencing and more emphasis on the use of fines and other alternative sanctions. In the early 1980's, work began on comprehensive sentencing reform and revisions to penalty scales for crimes identified in the Criminal Code. In 1988, legislation was introduced to add two new chapters to the Criminal Code: (1) measurement of punishment and remission of sanctions; and (2) choice of sanctions. Penalty scales were formulated based on the idea of penal value, a concept related to harm and offense seriousness. Sentencing reform in Sweden is generally based on uniformity in sentencing, equity mitigation in choosing between imprisonment and alternatives to imprisonment, and aggravating and mitigating circumstances affecting the sentencing process. Data on sentencing patterns in Sweden are provided. 25 footnotes and 4 tables
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Corrections in foreign countries; Foreign correctional systems; Foreign criminal justice systems; Foreign laws; Foreign policies; Foreign sentencing; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing reform; Sentencing statistics; Sweden
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=166957

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.