skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 167313 Find in a Library
Title: Hypnosis as an Investigative Tool
Journal: Law Enforcement Quarterly  Dated:(February-April 1997)  Pages:9-10
Author(s): E K Yager
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 2
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The use of hypnosis to refresh memory is a widely accepted therapeutic tool in the helping professions, but its use in the forensic setting is less widely accepted even though it can be a viable and effective technique.
Abstract: The value of hypnotically refreshed memory in criminal investigations has been demonstrated in many cases. Depending on several variables, hypnosis can permit the bypass of unconscious variables, facilitate clear memory of the event in question, and provide an opportunity to examine details not previously recognized. Hypnosis can help the individual remember a traumatic event dispassionately, without distortion or emotional blocking. Hypnotically refreshed memory is admissible in all cases in four States, inadmissible in all cases in three States, safeguarded in 12 States, and not regulated in 11 States; pre-hypnosis statements are admitted in 20 States. Only California, Texas, Washington, and Oregon have legislation regulating the use of hypnosis; all other States regulate hypnosis by case law. In particular, the California Supreme Court has approved the use of hypnosis in criminal proceedings but does not permit a witness to testify to material recovered through hypnosis. Even though the criminal investigator cannot be present during hypnosis, he or she can be watching and listening electronically and can feed questions to the clinician. The need for close cooperation between criminal investigators and prosecutors in cases involving hypnosis is emphasized.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): California; Criminal investigation; Evidence collection; Eyewitness memory; Oregon; Questioning under hypnosis; Rules of evidence; State laws; Texas; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167313

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.