skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 167481 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Independent Role of the Probation Officer at Sentencing and in Applying Koon v. United States
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:60  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1996)  Pages:71-79
Author(s): C M Goodwin
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Publisher: https://www.uscourts.gov 
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the role of the probation officer in Federal guidelines sentencing.
Abstract: The question of the nature of the role of the probation officer in Federal guidelines sentencing is a fundamental and recurring one. The case of Koon v. United States focuses renewed attention on the role of the officer in discussing and recommending departures and provides guidance for carrying out that role. The purpose of this article is to draw together the existing legal authority defining the role of the probation officer at sentencing and to make the case that preservation of an independent role for the probation officer is in the sentencing court's interest in order to ensure that the court receives objective information, that is, information separate from that agreed to or stipulated to by the parties, upon which to make the necessary sentencing determinations. It also examines new criteria for analyzing when a departure is appropriate, set out in Koon, and discusses the renewed importance of the probation officer's role in applying those criteria in the presentence report. Notes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Court personnel; Court procedures; Judicial decisions; Judicial process; Presentence investigations; Probation or parole officers; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing recommendations; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167481

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.