skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 167768 Find in a Library
Title: Megan's Laws: Sex Offender Registration and Notification Statutes and Constitutional Challenges (From Sex Offender: New Insights, Treatment Innovations and Legal Developments, Volume II, P 24-1 to 24-32, 1997, Barbara K. Schwartz and Henry R. Cellini, eds. - See NCJ-167745)
Author(s): E R Walsh
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 32
Sponsoring Agency: Civic Research Institute, Inc
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
Sale Source: Civic Research Institute, Inc
4478 US Route 27
P.O. Box 585
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Sex offender registration and community notification laws are examined with respect to the legal issues they raise and the results of litigation to date.
Abstract: The rape and murder of 7-year-old Megan Kanka in July 1994 was pivotal to the development of Federal and State laws regarding the collection and dissemination of information about sex offenders. All States and the Federal Government now have their own versions of what is called Megan's Law. Some researchers claim that the registration laws are ineffective at best and that notification laws may have an effect opposite from what was intended. No data exist to indicate that such laws actually reduce recidivism. Nearly every provision in these statutes has been challenged by offenders subject to them. Challenges have been based on ex post factor, bill of attainder, double jeopardy, and cruel and unusual punishment. Other challenges have looked at the nature of the individual interest involved, the intrusiveness of the government's action, the knowledge of the offender, or the jurisdiction over the offender. Most challenges to registration laws have not been upheld. Challenges to notification provisions have met with greater success, because notification is perceived as a more onerous burden on individual rights. Further legislation and legal challenges are likely. 244 reference notes
Main Term(s): Appellate court decisions
Index Term(s): Community-based corrections (adult); Federal Code; Parole conditions; Probation conditions; Sex offenders; Sexual assault victims; State laws
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.