skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 168155 Find in a Library
Title: Discriminatory Imposition of the Law: Does It Affect Sentencing Outcomes for American Indians? (From Native Americans, Crime, and Justice, P 197-208, 1996, Marianne O Nielsen and Robert A Silverman, eds. -- See NCJ-168132)
Author(s): R Bachman; A Alvarez; C Perkins
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Westview Press, Inc
Boulder, CO 80301
Sale Source: Westview Press, Inc
Marketing Director
5500 Central Avenue
Boulder, CO 80301
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter examines whether there are differences in sentencing outcomes for American Indians and whites within five States: Arizona, California, Minnesota, North Carolina, and North Dakota.
Abstract: After reviewing the relevant literature on the differential legal treatment of American Indians, the authors examine differences between Indians and whites for two adjudication outcomes within separate felony crime categories: sentence received for new State prison admissions and percent of sentence served for new State prison releases. The analysis was based on State prison admission and release data from the five States. In the aggregate, the data show that American Indians received longer sentences more often for offenses such as robbery and burglary, as well as for drug trafficking and public order offenses, and whites more often received longer sentences for larceny. The results for homicide, sexual assault, and assault were more closely matched. These patterns, however, varied greatly by crime and State. The greater leniency for American Indians in some cases may be consistent with certain theoretical propositions presented in the literature. Indian-on-Indian crimes may yield more lenient sentences for the Indian offenders; whereas, Indian-on-white crimes may produce harsher sentences for the Indian offenders. Compared to white inmates, American Indian inmates showed a clear pattern of serving higher proportions of their sentences in every State except California for every crime. Overall, results suggest the possibility that at least some degree of discriminatory behavior by the criminal justice system exists against American Indians. The extent and nature of this discrimination is still unclear, however, and more research is needed. 5 tables and 3 notes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): American Indians; Arizona; California; Minnesota; North Carolina; North Dakota; Racial discrimination; Sentencing disparity
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.