skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 168204 Find in a Library
Title: Medico-Legal Ethics in Forensic Psychotherapy (From A Practical Guide to Forensic Psychotherapy, P 253-258, 1997, Estela V Welldon and Cleo Van Velsen, eds. -- See NCJ-168168)
Author(s): J Stone
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
London, N1 9JN, England
Sale Source: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
118 Pentonville Road
London, N1 9JN,
United Kingdom
Type: Training (Aid/Material)
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This overview of medico-legal ethics in forensic psychotherapy focuses on the nature and extent of therapists' duty of care, reconciling conflicting duties, and doing no harm.
Abstract: Any therapeutic relationship involves ethical responsibilities. Benefiting the patient is the guiding Hippocratic principle. Although all therapists would accept that treating a patient may have consequences for third parties, ordinarily their duty as therapists lies in helping the individual. In a forensic setting, however, this position is fundamentally different. The purpose of forensic psychotherapy is to help offenders understand their actions in the hope that this will prevent them from reoffending. Forensic psychotherapists also have direct responsibilities to the state as their employers. This ambiguity has profound ethical implications; it raises a number of issues: (1) Does the psychotherapist serve the patient, the institution, or society as a whole? and further, (2) how far do forensic psychotherapists' duties extend toward third parties who may be in danger from the patient. Because of psychotherapists' responsibility to parties in addition to the patient, they should explain to patients that they may not be able to maintain strict confidentiality to their clients at the outset of treatment, but should nonetheless attempt to secure the patient's consent before disclosing confidential information to others. In discussing the reconciliation of conflicting duties, this paper addresses the need for consent, respect for confidentiality in a forensic setting, and the role of the therapist in case conferences and tribunals. In discussing issues pertinent to the ethical mandate to "do no harm," the author addresses training, the recognition of the limits of competence, the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a forensic setting, and resources.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Forensic psychiatry; Mentally ill offenders; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychiatric services
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=168204

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.