skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 168933 Find in a Library
Title: Bail and Detention: An Assessment and Critique of the Federal and Massachusetts Systems
Journal: New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement  Volume:22  Issue:2  Dated:(Spring 1996)  Pages:213-290
Author(s): E Harmsworth
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 78
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the various methods used to release or detain defendants between arraignment and trial: release on recognizance (ROR), release on money bail, conditional release, and detention in jail; it focuses on the Federal system and the Massachusetts State system.
Abstract: One section of the article discusses attempts to expand pretrial release. The topics addressed are ROR and the Manhattan Bail Project, the selection of and valuation of money bail, statutory criteria used in the release and bail decision, and conditional release and the role of pretrial services agencies. Another section considers attempts to curtail pretrial release. Topics discussed in this section are "Nebbia" motions and State equivalents, the 1984 Federal Bail Reform Act, and the 1994 Massachusetts Pretrial Detention Statute. The author develops a proposal from the model system of pretrial release suggested by Wayne Thomas. Thomas argues that bail should be viewed as a sequence of various filtering decisions, each of which filters out about half of the remaining defendants. In this model, the filters consist of police release through citations and summonses, preset bail schedules, ROR, conditional release, and cash bail. Today, the use of citations and summonses is widespread and uncontroversial. A contemporary view of the court- run bail system would have to name the filters as ROR, conditional release, money bail, and pretrial detention. This article advocates that these filters be changed so that they "trickle" out the most appropriate number of defendants at each stage on the basis of statistical evidence that shows the optimum number that should receive each different type of release. The first stage, ROR, is suitable for approximately 90 percent of the defendants whose cases appear before a judge. Pretrial detention would be reserved for that 4-5 percent of defendants who are the most dangerous or flight-prone. 473 footnotes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Bail/Financial Release; Federal Bail Reform Act; Federal bail system; Federal courts; Massachusetts; Pretrial detention; Pretrial release; Pretrial services agencies; State courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.