skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 169515 Find in a Library
Title: Restorative Justice: The Concept
Journal: Corrections Today  Volume:59  Issue:7  Dated:(December 1997)  Pages:68-70
Author(s): H Zehr
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 3
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In presenting the principles of restorative justice as a corrections paradigm, this article compares it with the retributive justice model it seeks to replace.
Abstract: At a recent consultation of restorative justice and rehabilitation specialists sponsored by the National Institute of Corrections Academy, participants agreed that two ideas are fundamental; restorative justice is harm-focused, and it promotes the engagement of an enlarged set of stakeholders. Restorative justice views crime, first of all, as harm done to people and communities. The current legal system (retributive justice) focuses on rules and laws, often losing sight of the harm done to specific victims by the offender and the offense; consequently, retributive justice makes victims, at best, a secondary concern of justice. A harm focus, however, implies a central concern for victims' need and roles. Restorative justice thus begins with a concern for victims and how to meet their needs, for repairing the harm as much as possible, both concretely and symbolically. A focus on harm also implies an emphasis on offender accountability and responsibility. Too often accountability has been viewed as punishment under the retributive justice model. Little under this model encourages offenders to understand the consequences of their actions or to empathize with victims. Accountability further means taking responsibility for making things right with victims and the community as far as possible. This implies a primary focus on offender restitution, through money and services, to victims and the community. Underlying the practice of restitution is the aim to achieve healing for the harm done and responsibilities breached. Society rarely achieves justice that is fully restorative. A realistic goal is to move as far as possible toward a process that puts victims, offenders, and members of the affected community, along with their respective needs and roles, at the center of the search for a justice that heals.
Main Term(s): Victim-offender reconciliation
Index Term(s): Corrections policies; Restitution; Victim compensation; Victim services
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.