skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 169807 Find in a Library
Title: United Nations Standards and Norms in the Field of Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice: Capital Punishment and Implementation of the Safeguards Guaranteeing the Protection of the Rights of Those Facing the Death Penalty: Report of the Secretary-General
Corporate Author: United Nations
Economic and Social Council
Cmssn on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
Austria
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 47
Sponsoring Agency: United Nations
Vienna, Austria
Publication Number: E/CN.15/1996/19
Sale Source: United Nations
Economic and Social Council
Cmssn on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
Vienna,
Austria
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Language: English
Country: Austria
Annotation: This report analyzes different countries' use of capital punishment, trends in its use, and implementation of offender safeguards recommended by the United Nations Economic and Social Council.
Abstract: The analysis used data from a survey that covered the years 1989-93 and from analysis of criminological research. The results were used to group countries into three categories. Those that did not contemplate the death penalty in their laws were regarded as abolitionist. Those that retained capital punishment for ordinary crimes but had not executed anyone during the last 10 years or more were considered abolitionist de facto. All the others were defined as retentionist in that capital punishment existed and was used. Results revealed that 43 of the 69 countries that responded to the survey were abolitionist. Twenty-six were retentionist, although 9 of these were considered abolitionist de facto. Compared with previous surveys, a lower proportion of all countries responding to this survey were retentionist. Since 1989, 25 countries have abolished the death penalty, 23 of them for all crimes whether in peacetime or in war. Responses varied regarding the implementation of safeguards for the protection of the rights of persons facing the death penalty and indicated that little if any action has been taken to give the safeguards prominence or to communicate them to those who might be concerned in capital cases. Appended tables and additional results
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Corrections in foreign countries; Foreign laws; Prisoner's rights; United Nations standards
Note: Item 7 of the provisional agenda, Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, 5th Session, Vienna, Austria, May 21-31, 1996
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=169807

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.