skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 170266 Find in a Library
Title: Effect of Evidence Factors and Victim Characteristics on Prosecutors' Charging Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases
Journal: Justice Quarterly  Volume:14  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1997)  Pages:501-524
Author(s): J W Spears; C C Spohn
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
Grant Number: SES-9010826
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Charging decisions by Detroit prosecutors in 321 sexual assault cases were analyzed to determine whether criminal justice officials base their decisions on stereotypes of rape and thus that legally irrelevant victim characteristics determine the outcomes of these cases.
Abstract: The cases had all been reported to the Detroit Police Department in 1989. The sample included only cases presented to the warrant section of the Wayne County (Mich.) Prosecutor's Office for a decision to file charges. The analysis included six case characteristics and eight victim characteristics and controlled for four evidence factors. Results revealed that prosecutors were much more likely to file charges if the victim was an adolescent or an adult rather than a child. Charging was also affected by the victim's moral character and her behavior at the time of the incident. Moreover, these victim characteristics influenced charging regardless of the strength of the evidence in the case or whether the crime was classified as an aggravated or a simple sexual assault. Overall, findings suggested that Detroit prosecutors regard victim characteristics as relevant to convictability in all types of sexual assault cases. Findings also suggested that prosecutors attempted to avoid uncertainty by screening out sexual assault cases unlikely to result in a conviction because of questions about the victim's character, the victim's behavior at the time of the incident, and the victim's credibility. Tables, footnotes, case citation, statute citation, and 58 references (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Criminal Justice System Response to Victims; Discrimination; Michigan; Prosecutorial discretion; Sexual assault
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=170266

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.