skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 171155 Find in a Library
Title: Detention Diversion Advocacy: An Evaluation
Author(s): Randall G. Shelden
Date Published: 1999
Page Count: 16
Sponsoring Agency: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper provides an overview and evaluation of San Francisco's Detention Diversion Advocacy Program (DDAP), which involves lay persons acting on behalf of youthful offenders at disposition hearings for the purpose of diverting appropriate juveniles from detention to appropriate community services.
Abstract: Detention advocacy involves identifying youth likely to be detained pending their adjudication. Once a potential client is identified, DDAP case managers present a release plan to the judge that includes a list of appropriate community services (e.g., tutoring, drug counseling, and family counseling) that will be accessed on the youth's behalf. Additionally, the plan includes specified objectives as a means to assess the youth's progress in the program. Emphasis is given to allowing the youth to live at home while participating in the program. If home placement is not a viable option, program staff will identify and secure a suitable alternative. If the judge deems the release plan acceptable, the youth is released to DDAP supervision. In 1997 the Youth Guidance Center in San Francisco conducted an outcome evaluation of the DDAP program. The evaluation used chi-square statistical analysis. Data were collected from printouts obtained from the San Francisco Department of Juvenile Probation in order to compare a group of DDAP youth with a group of youth who remained within the juvenile court system. Systematic sampling techniques were used to select the comparison group. Findings show that when recidivism is used as the key measure of success, the youth referred to DDAP have been more successful than those not referred. DDAP youth, who might have otherwise been deemed a threat to public safety and placed in detention for days or even weeks, had recidivism rates that were nearly 50 percent less than those of the comparison group. These findings support the proposition that intensive supervision over an extended period of time, coupled with placement in community-based programs, enabled DDAP youth to lead relatively normal lives while reducing the likelihood of further contact with the juvenile justice system. 9 tables and 51 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile diversion programs
Index Term(s): California; Community-based corrections (juvenile); Juvenile detention; Juvenile detention decisionmaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.