skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 171190 Find in a Library
Title: Inevitable Discovery Exception to the Exclusionary Rule
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:66  Issue:9  Dated:(September 1997)  Pages:26-32
Author(s): E M Hendrie
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents an overview of the exclusionary rule and discusses in detail the inevitable discovery exception to that rule.
Abstract: In 1914, the US Supreme Court ruled that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee of protection from unreasonable searches and seizures could not be used by the government against a defendant at trial. A later Court ruling prohibited introducing not only items directly seized during an illegal government search but also any evidence indirectly derived from that search. Although the exclusionary rule most often is applied to violations of the Fourth Amendment, it has been applied to other constitutional violations as well. The Supreme Court consistently has recognized that inflexible application of the exclusionary rule would generate disrespect for the law and impede the administration of justice. Therefore, courts have carved out a number of exceptions and limitations to the rule. For instance, courts generally will not suppress evidence that has been seized illegally if the government can establish that the evidence inevitably would have been discovered lawfully. The article discusses active pursuit of an independent investigation in order to successfully assert the inevitable discovery exception, inevitable discovery by private parties, and inevitable discovery of primary evidence. Notes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Bill of Rights; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Evidence; Exceptions to exclusionary rule; Exclusionary rule; Police legal limitations; Rules of evidence; Search and seizure laws; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.