skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 171352 Find in a Library
Title: Meta-Analysis of the Predictors of Adult Offender Recidivism: What Works!
Journal: Criminology  Volume:34  Issue:4  Dated:(November 1996)  Pages:575-607
Author(s): P Gendreau; T Little; C Goggin
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 33
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Meta-analytic techniques were used to analyze 131 studies published between January 1970 and June 1994 to determine which predictor domains and actuarial assessment instruments were the best predictors of recidivism among adult offenders.
Abstract: Criteria for including the studies included collection of offender data prior to the recording of the criterion measures, a minimum follow-up period of 6 months, the recording of the outcome measure when the offender was 18 years old or older, and other factors. The predictors were grouped into eight predictor domains. The studies generated 1,141 correlations with recidivism. The strongest predictor domains were criminogenic needs, criminal history/history of antisocial behavior, social achievement, age/gender/race, and family factors. Weaker predictors included intellectual functioning, personal distress factors, and socioeconomic status in the family of origin. Dynamic predictor domains such as antisocial personality and drug abuse performed at least as well as the static domains such as age and criminal history. The most useful actuarial measure was the Level of Service Inventory (LSI-R) from Andrews and Bonta in 1995. Findings clarified which predictor domains and actuarial measures of risk will be the most useful to practitioners and policymakers. Tables, footnotes, and 72 references (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Evaluation measures; Recidivism prediction; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.