skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 182365 Find in a Library
Title: Exploratory Analysis of Client Outcomes, Costs, and Benefits of Day Reporting Centers -- Final Report
Author(s): Amy Craddock
Corporate Author: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE)
United States of America
Date Published: March 2000
Page Count: 37
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE)
San Diego, CA 92120
Grant Number: 97-IJ-CX-0006
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This exploratory study examined the cost-effectiveness of two day reporting centers (DRCs) that serve high-risk/high-need probationers with substance abuse problems.
Abstract: The two DRCs are in Wisconsin, one in a small rural town and the other in a small city. Both centers are operated by the same private, nonprofit organization and have almost identical schedules and content. Program content addresses three general areas: alcohol and other drug abuse, criminality, and independent living skills. This exploratory study first examined rearrest among clients. Next, it compared DRC clients with two comparison groups of probationers. One group corresponded to the population eligible for DRC programs, and the other group consisted of high-risk/high-need probationers who are the target population for the DRC programs. The study also examined the net benefits (costs) to the criminal justice system of both DRC's. Because of the small sample sizes and exploratory nature of the study, the results are suggestive and impressionistic rather than definitive. Logistic regression models show that completion of the DRC program was associated with a lower chance of rearrest. This model also supports dominant findings in the literature that extent of prior record is a strong predictor of future criminality and that younger offenders tend to have higher recidivism. The average DRC program completer in the rural program apparently saved the criminal justice system approximately $1,893 during the 12-month follow-up period. In the urban county, probation officers primarily referred their most troublesome supervisees to the DRC as an alternative to revocation. The average program completer cost the system approximately $359. Without access to the DRC, however, costs to the system would have been much greater. 5 tables, 2 figures, and 23 references
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis; Day reporting centers; NIJ final report; Probation conditions; Probation costs; Probation or parole services; Rural urban comparisons
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.