skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 183185 Find in a Library
Title: Projective Techniques and the Detection of Child Sexual Abuse
Journal: Child Maltreatment  Volume:5  Issue:2  Dated:May 2000  Pages:161-168
Author(s): Howard N. Garb; James M. Wood; M. Teresa Nezworski
Editor(s): Mark Chaffin
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 8
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com 
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Projective techniques, for example, Rorschach and human figure drawings, are sometimes used to detect child sexual abuse, but the authors contend they should not be used because many of the studies purportedly demonstrating their validity are flawed and none of the projective test scores have been well replicated.
Abstract: New meta-analyses were conducted to analyze the results from studies identified by West (1998). Both non-significant and statistically significant results were considered, and were coded as favoring projective techniques or not favoring projective techniques. Even though West determined projective tests constituted a valid method for detecting child sexual abuse, the new meta-analyses indicated that West's research was flawed because she excluded all non-significant results. Further, given that positive findings obtained by West have not been replicated, incremental validity has not been established, and normative data are not available for many minority groups, the authors believe that projective techniques should not be used to detect child sexual abuse. They indicate, however, that the use of projective techniques will continue to be debated. 48 references and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Abused children; Child abuse detection; Child Sexual Abuse; Child victims; Crimes against children; Juvenile psychological evaluation; Psychological research; Sexual assault victims
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=183185

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.